<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 277 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed that the refund of duty paid through Modvat/Cenvat accounts should be credited to the respective account, not refunded in cash, except in cases of export. Due to conflicting decisions on refund by cash/cheque in the absence of a specific provision, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution. The judgment emphasized the need for clarity and uniformity in addressing the complexities of refunding duty paid through Modvat/Cenvat accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 277 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed that the refund of duty paid through Modvat/Cenvat accounts should be credited to the respective account, not refunded in cash, except in cases of export. Due to conflicting decisions on refund by cash/cheque in the absence of a specific provision, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution. The judgment emphasized the need for clarity and uniformity in addressing the complexities of refunding duty paid through Modvat/Cenvat accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>