<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 516 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal pro-tanto, addressing the issues of legality and valuation comprehensively. It emphasized the need for proper authorization in recording statements during surveys and highlighted the importance of accurate stock valuation based on actual costs. The case was remitted to the AO for fresh adjudication on specific aspects, ensuring a fair and thorough examination of the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 516 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal pro-tanto, addressing the issues of legality and valuation comprehensively. It emphasized the need for proper authorization in recording statements during surveys and highlighted the importance of accurate stock valuation based on actual costs. The case was remitted to the AO for fresh adjudication on specific aspects, ensuring a fair and thorough examination of the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>