https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117571 The Tribunal dismissed the domestic industry's appeal, upholding the Designated Authority's (D.A.) findings and recommendations. The D.A. correctly examined sunset review parameters, justified a 20% quality adjustment, and had the authority to modify anti-dumping duty. It verified exporters' information accuracy and appropriately recommended separate duties for new exporters. The withdrawal of duty on U.H.P. graphite electrodes was deemed appropriate. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 13-4-2006. en-us Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117571 The Tribunal dismissed the domestic industry's appeal, upholding the Designated Authority's (D.A.) findings and recommendations. The D.A. correctly examined sunset review parameters, justified a 20% quality adjustment, and had the authority to modify anti-dumping duty. It verified exporters' information accuracy and appropriately recommended separate duties for new exporters. The withdrawal of duty on U.H.P. graphite electrodes was deemed appropriate. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 13-4-2006. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117571