https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117565 A product marketed for prevention and treatment of stretch marks during pregnancy was treated as an ayurvedic medicament, not a skin care cosmetic, because its literature described therapeutic use for a specific pregnancy-related condition, the dosage was prescribed, use was limited to a short period, and FDA approval treated it as medicine. The classification under sub-heading 3303.09 was therefore upheld. On limitation, disclosure of the product name and medicament classification in the classification declaration meant there was no basis to allege suppression or misstatement, so the extended period of limitation was not available. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:44:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117565 A product marketed for prevention and treatment of stretch marks during pregnancy was treated as an ayurvedic medicament, not a skin care cosmetic, because its literature described therapeutic use for a specific pregnancy-related condition, the dosage was prescribed, use was limited to a short period, and FDA approval treated it as medicine. The classification under sub-heading 3303.09 was therefore upheld. On limitation, disclosure of the product name and medicament classification in the classification declaration meant there was no basis to allege suppression or misstatement, so the extended period of limitation was not available. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117565