https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117550 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appellant's stay applications against a confirmed demand of duty and penalties. The Tribunal found the evidence solely based on a transporter's records insufficient to establish clandestine removal, noting the lack of corroborative evidence like procurement or processing details. Acknowledging the appellant's financial hardship and strong prima facie case, the Tribunal unconditionally granted all stay petitions, prioritizing expedited final disposal. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:44:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117550 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appellant's stay applications against a confirmed demand of duty and penalties. The Tribunal found the evidence solely based on a transporter's records insufficient to establish clandestine removal, noting the lack of corroborative evidence like procurement or processing details. Acknowledging the appellant's financial hardship and strong prima facie case, the Tribunal unconditionally granted all stay petitions, prioritizing expedited final disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117550