<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 388 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition unconditionally in favor of the appellant, who manufactures Bakery Improvers, Cake Improvers, Helios Liquid Emulsifiers, and Cake-N-Soft. The dispute centered on the classification of these products, with the Revenue arguing for classification under heading 2108.99, while the appellant contended they should be classified under Chapters 15 and 19. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s classification prima facie valid based on various legal references and ordered the stay, scheduling the appeal for final disposal on 17-4-2006 due to the significant demand involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 388 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition unconditionally in favor of the appellant, who manufactures Bakery Improvers, Cake Improvers, Helios Liquid Emulsifiers, and Cake-N-Soft. The dispute centered on the classification of these products, with the Revenue arguing for classification under heading 2108.99, while the appellant contended they should be classified under Chapters 15 and 19. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s classification prima facie valid based on various legal references and ordered the stay, scheduling the appeal for final disposal on 17-4-2006 due to the significant demand involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>