<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 385 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117537</link>
    <description>Interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not attracted because the dispute concerned only the release and encashment of National Savings Certificates furnished as security for a licence and bond, not a refund of excise duty. As the claim did not fall within the scope of Section 11B, the demand for interest was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 385 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117537</link>
      <description>Interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not attracted because the dispute concerned only the release and encashment of National Savings Certificates furnished as security for a licence and bond, not a refund of excise duty. As the claim did not fall within the scope of Section 11B, the demand for interest was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>