<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 543 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the additions of Rs. 9,75,000 and Rs. 1,20,000. It found the addition of Rs. 9,75,000 from Cyberspace Films Pvt. Ltd. under section 68 and as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) unjustified. Similarly, the addition of Rs. 1,20,000 from Mrs. Prity Dadlani was deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal emphasized that the sources were adequately explained, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions were erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 543 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the additions of Rs. 9,75,000 and Rs. 1,20,000. It found the addition of Rs. 9,75,000 from Cyberspace Films Pvt. Ltd. under section 68 and as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) unjustified. Similarly, the addition of Rs. 1,20,000 from Mrs. Prity Dadlani was deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal emphasized that the sources were adequately explained, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions were erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>