<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 352 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, led by Vice-President S.S. Kang, found the applicant&#039;s case strong prima facie. Noting the demand is for monitors, not computer systems, the Tribunal deemed the duty calculation based on computer system value unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the entire duty amount, allowing the stay petitions. The decision was dictated and pronounced on 1-3-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 352 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, led by Vice-President S.S. Kang, found the applicant&#039;s case strong prima facie. Noting the demand is for monitors, not computer systems, the Tribunal deemed the duty calculation based on computer system value unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the entire duty amount, allowing the stay petitions. The decision was dictated and pronounced on 1-3-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>