<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 482 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117491</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the revenue against the deduction allowed to the assessee under section 80-O of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93 was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed that only 20% of the assessee&#039;s receipt in convertible foreign exchange should be eligible for deduction under section 80-O, contrary to the 100% accepted by the ld. CIT(A). The deduction under section 80-O was to be calculated based on this adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:19:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 482 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117491</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the revenue against the deduction allowed to the assessee under section 80-O of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1992-93 was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed that only 20% of the assessee&#039;s receipt in convertible foreign exchange should be eligible for deduction under section 80-O, contrary to the 100% accepted by the ld. CIT(A). The deduction under section 80-O was to be calculated based on this adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>