<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 381 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117480</link>
    <description>A circular permitting conversion of shipping bills from one export promotion scheme to another applies where export benefit is denied because of a genuine dispute. The exporter had sought alternative scheme treatment after DEPB rates were suspended, and the controversy over the available benefit was real rather than formal. The authority&#039;s refusal rested on an incorrect finding that no dispute existed, even though the shipping bills had been provisionally assessed under DEPB and later finalised as free shipping bills. The proper effect was that conversion could not be denied when the dispute condition in the circular was satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:29:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 381 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117480</link>
      <description>A circular permitting conversion of shipping bills from one export promotion scheme to another applies where export benefit is denied because of a genuine dispute. The exporter had sought alternative scheme treatment after DEPB rates were suspended, and the controversy over the available benefit was real rather than formal. The authority&#039;s refusal rested on an incorrect finding that no dispute existed, even though the shipping bills had been provisionally assessed under DEPB and later finalised as free shipping bills. The proper effect was that conversion could not be denied when the dispute condition in the circular was satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>