<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 478 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It remanded the issue concerning the Rs. 10,00,000 addition back to the AO for fresh consideration, directing the AO to allow the assessee to produce details of sundry creditors. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude capital gains from book profits computation under Section 115JA, affirming that exempt income under one provision cannot be taxed under another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 478 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It remanded the issue concerning the Rs. 10,00,000 addition back to the AO for fresh consideration, directing the AO to allow the assessee to produce details of sundry creditors. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude capital gains from book profits computation under Section 115JA, affirming that exempt income under one provision cannot be taxed under another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>