<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117464</link>
    <description>An imported X-ray generator specially designed for a particular CT scanner was treated as a part required for the manufacture of the CT scan system, making the exemption under Notification No. 17/01-Cus. available. The custom-made nature of the generator, its inability to serve general use, and its technical indispensability to producing X-ray images were decisive. The distinction between a part of the completed medical equipment and a component required for its manufacture was rejected, and the expression &quot;required for manufacture&quot; was applied broadly to include essential components not directly used in final assembly but necessary for the functioning of the equipment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117464</link>
      <description>An imported X-ray generator specially designed for a particular CT scanner was treated as a part required for the manufacture of the CT scan system, making the exemption under Notification No. 17/01-Cus. available. The custom-made nature of the generator, its inability to serve general use, and its technical indispensability to producing X-ray images were decisive. The distinction between a part of the completed medical equipment and a component required for its manufacture was rejected, and the expression &quot;required for manufacture&quot; was applied broadly to include essential components not directly used in final assembly but necessary for the functioning of the equipment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>