<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 367 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for Modvat/Cenvat credit on furnace oil used for electricity generation in a residential township, affirming that such areas are not part of the factory under the Central Excise Act. The redemption fine was set aside, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs. Interest payment was confirmed as necessary. The appeal was partially allowed, with the decision pronounced on 20-2-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 367 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for Modvat/Cenvat credit on furnace oil used for electricity generation in a residential township, affirming that such areas are not part of the factory under the Central Excise Act. The redemption fine was set aside, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs. Interest payment was confirmed as necessary. The appeal was partially allowed, with the decision pronounced on 20-2-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>