<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 355 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117445</link>
    <description>Amounts collected as excise duty on exempted goods were treated as not prima facie recoverable as duty under Section 11D, because the Tribunal found the issue covered by its earlier view that the 8% amount collected under Rule 57CC was not duty exigible for deposit. Without deciding the final merits, the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s request for interim protection and granted waiver of pre-deposit. Recovery of the disputed amount was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 355 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117445</link>
      <description>Amounts collected as excise duty on exempted goods were treated as not prima facie recoverable as duty under Section 11D, because the Tribunal found the issue covered by its earlier view that the 8% amount collected under Rule 57CC was not duty exigible for deposit. Without deciding the final merits, the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s request for interim protection and granted waiver of pre-deposit. Recovery of the disputed amount was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>