https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117410 The Tribunal confirmed duty demands under S. No. 1 and 4, reduced the duty demand under S. No. 2 to Rs. 3,81,360, and set aside the Modvat credit demand under S. No. 3. Penalties were imposed on the manufacturer but reduced to Rs. Four lakhs, while the penalty on the Director of the Company was set aside. The judgment was delivered on 30-1-2006, with detailed reasoning provided for each issue addressed. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:02:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117410 The Tribunal confirmed duty demands under S. No. 1 and 4, reduced the duty demand under S. No. 2 to Rs. 3,81,360, and set aside the Modvat credit demand under S. No. 3. Penalties were imposed on the manufacturer but reduced to Rs. Four lakhs, while the penalty on the Director of the Company was set aside. The judgment was delivered on 30-1-2006, with detailed reasoning provided for each issue addressed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117410