<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 498 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the prima facie adjustment made by the Assessing Officer and the consequent levy of additional tax were unjustified. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, recognizing that the return filed was correct per the law prevailing at the time. The Tribunal emphasized that a revised return could not be expected when the original return was accurate and the law was amended retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 498 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the prima facie adjustment made by the Assessing Officer and the consequent levy of additional tax were unjustified. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, recognizing that the return filed was correct per the law prevailing at the time. The Tribunal emphasized that a revised return could not be expected when the original return was accurate and the law was amended retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>