<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 497 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, dismissing the departmental appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on the applicability of sections 192, 194-I, and 194J. The deletion of penalty under section 271C was upheld, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the assessee&#039;s belief in the tax deductions made was bona fide and reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 497 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, dismissing the departmental appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on the applicability of sections 192, 194-I, and 194J. The deletion of penalty under section 271C was upheld, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the assessee&#039;s belief in the tax deductions made was bona fide and reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>