<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 403 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for a mistake apparent from the record, as it found it necessary to ascertain the provisional nature of assessments due to the limitation plea raised by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that determining the provisional nature of assessments was crucial in cases where duty demands are contested based on limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act. By analyzing the provisional nature of assessments, the Tribunal clarified that if assessments were indeed provisional, the question of limitation would not apply, thus justifying its decision to examine this aspect and dismissing the appellant&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 403 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for a mistake apparent from the record, as it found it necessary to ascertain the provisional nature of assessments due to the limitation plea raised by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that determining the provisional nature of assessments was crucial in cases where duty demands are contested based on limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act. By analyzing the provisional nature of assessments, the Tribunal clarified that if assessments were indeed provisional, the question of limitation would not apply, thus justifying its decision to examine this aspect and dismissing the appellant&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>