<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 873 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal considered the additional evidence submitted by the assessee&#039;s representative, noting that the various additions made would not have been necessary if the assessee had appeared earlier. Emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities, the Tribunal prioritized fairness in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 873 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal considered the additional evidence submitted by the assessee&#039;s representative, noting that the various additions made would not have been necessary if the assessee had appeared earlier. Emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities, the Tribunal prioritized fairness in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>