<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 379 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed Customs Duty on imported goods and Central Excise Duty on indigenously procured goods for aquaculture farms. Penalties were imposed for non-compliance with Customs Act and Central Excise Rules. The appellants failed to meet export obligations under the EOU scheme, leading to denial of duty exemptions. Despite circumstances, duty exemptions were denied for not fulfilling export conditions. Confiscation of goods and penalties were set aside due to uncontrollable factors. The appeals concluded with duty confirmations, denial of exemptions, and overturning of confiscation and penalties based on the appellants&#039; failure to fulfill export obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:17:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 379 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed Customs Duty on imported goods and Central Excise Duty on indigenously procured goods for aquaculture farms. Penalties were imposed for non-compliance with Customs Act and Central Excise Rules. The appellants failed to meet export obligations under the EOU scheme, leading to denial of duty exemptions. Despite circumstances, duty exemptions were denied for not fulfilling export conditions. Confiscation of goods and penalties were set aside due to uncontrollable factors. The appeals concluded with duty confirmations, denial of exemptions, and overturning of confiscation and penalties based on the appellants&#039; failure to fulfill export obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>