<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 376 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117370</link>
    <description>Bending, welding and sand-blasting of perforated steel sheets for use in rubber rolls did not amount to manufacture because the processed sheets remained hollow profiles with only a rounded shape and sand-blasting was merely a cleaning process. As no new product with a distinct name, character or use emerged, the activity fell outside manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff. No duty demand arose, and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 376 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117370</link>
      <description>Bending, welding and sand-blasting of perforated steel sheets for use in rubber rolls did not amount to manufacture because the processed sheets remained hollow profiles with only a rounded shape and sand-blasting was merely a cleaning process. As no new product with a distinct name, character or use emerged, the activity fell outside manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff. No duty demand arose, and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>