https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117368 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the duty demand at 15% for imports under the EPCG Scheme unjustified. The appellant's imports were deemed eligible for the 10% assessment as per the DGFT notifications in 1997, which automatically amended duty rates for covered licenses. The Tribunal held that specific endorsement on the license was not required as the general notifications had already altered the duty rates. Consequently, the duty demand at 15% was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief for the appellants. en-us Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117368 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the duty demand at 15% for imports under the EPCG Scheme unjustified. The appellant's imports were deemed eligible for the 10% assessment as per the DGFT notifications in 1997, which automatically amended duty rates for covered licenses. The Tribunal held that specific endorsement on the license was not required as the general notifications had already altered the duty rates. Consequently, the duty demand at 15% was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief for the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117368