<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 582 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117368</link>
    <description>Imports made under EPCG licences issued under the 1992-97 policy were held eligible for the revised 10% customs duty rate after later DGFT notifications, because the notifications applied generally to earlier policy licences for imports cleared after their issue. The benefit was not dependent on a fresh endorsement in each licence, and the original reference to 15% could not justify denial of the concessional rate. The record also showed installation of the machines for export production and completion of export obligation, and the DGFT clarification supported entitlement. On that basis, assessment at 15% was rejected as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 582 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117368</link>
      <description>Imports made under EPCG licences issued under the 1992-97 policy were held eligible for the revised 10% customs duty rate after later DGFT notifications, because the notifications applied generally to earlier policy licences for imports cleared after their issue. The benefit was not dependent on a fresh endorsement in each licence, and the original reference to 15% could not justify denial of the concessional rate. The record also showed installation of the machines for export production and completion of export obligation, and the DGFT clarification supported entitlement. On that basis, assessment at 15% was rejected as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>