<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 372 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117365</link>
    <description>Credit utilisation for payment of duty in the first fortnight of August 2000 was upheld because the amendment to Rule 57AB took effect on 18-8-2000 and the Board&#039;s circular of 25-8-2000 clarified the position. As the duty payment and debit entry were both made on 19-8-2000, the credit remained available for use. The appellate authority also treated the matter as revenue neutral, noting that even if payment had been made through PLA, the credit would have continued to be available for the next fortnight. On that basis, the demand and penalty challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:54:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 372 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117365</link>
      <description>Credit utilisation for payment of duty in the first fortnight of August 2000 was upheld because the amendment to Rule 57AB took effect on 18-8-2000 and the Board&#039;s circular of 25-8-2000 clarified the position. As the duty payment and debit entry were both made on 19-8-2000, the credit remained available for use. The appellate authority also treated the matter as revenue neutral, noting that even if payment had been made through PLA, the credit would have continued to be available for the next fortnight. On that basis, the demand and penalty challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>