https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117361 The Tribunal held that the appellants, a 100% E.O.U., were not responsible for the broad banding permission omission for weaving of fabrics as it was corrected by a corrigendum. The demand for duty payment on cleared goods and penalties imposed were deemed unwarranted as the appellants had followed necessary procedures, obtained permissions, and fulfilled export obligations. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding the penalties unjustified and allowing the appeals. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:32:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117361 The Tribunal held that the appellants, a 100% E.O.U., were not responsible for the broad banding permission omission for weaving of fabrics as it was corrected by a corrigendum. The demand for duty payment on cleared goods and penalties imposed were deemed unwarranted as the appellants had followed necessary procedures, obtained permissions, and fulfilled export obligations. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding the penalties unjustified and allowing the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117361