https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117348 Clearances of castings to job workers were treated as falling under Rule 57F(3), and the assessee produced declarations filed under that provision for the relevant period. The demand was based on the premise that Rule 56B procedure had not been followed, but the record indicated that the disputed removals were not under Rule 56B. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the assessee had established a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty demand. en-us Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:49:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117348 Clearances of castings to job workers were treated as falling under Rule 57F(3), and the assessee produced declarations filed under that provision for the relevant period. The demand was based on the premise that Rule 56B procedure had not been followed, but the record indicated that the disputed removals were not under Rule 56B. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the assessee had established a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117348