https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117338 The Tribunal held that the duty demand on job work for expanding the Sugar Mill's capacity was unsustainable. It ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the machinery installed at the site was not subject to excise duty as it became a permanent structure. The appellant had already paid duty on items manufactured in its factory, and the duty demand for items fabricated at the site by contractors was not justified. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand confirmation by the Commissioner, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:18:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117338 The Tribunal held that the duty demand on job work for expanding the Sugar Mill's capacity was unsustainable. It ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the machinery installed at the site was not subject to excise duty as it became a permanent structure. The appellant had already paid duty on items manufactured in its factory, and the duty demand for items fabricated at the site by contractors was not justified. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand confirmation by the Commissioner, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117338