https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117328 The appellants' claim for Modvat/CENVAT credit on inputs with non-compliant invoices was rejected by the lower authorities due to the invoices not meeting prescribed requirements, specifically the color code mandate under Rule 57-GG. Despite the appellants' explanation of a printing error from the supplier, the plea was denied. The advocate argued for credit allowance despite minor discrepancies in the invoices, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal acknowledged conflicting orders on invoice color admissibility and recommended the matter be referred to a Larger Bench for resolution, emphasizing the need for further consideration to address the inconsistent precedents. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:52:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117328 The appellants' claim for Modvat/CENVAT credit on inputs with non-compliant invoices was rejected by the lower authorities due to the invoices not meeting prescribed requirements, specifically the color code mandate under Rule 57-GG. Despite the appellants' explanation of a printing error from the supplier, the plea was denied. The advocate argued for credit allowance despite minor discrepancies in the invoices, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal acknowledged conflicting orders on invoice color admissibility and recommended the matter be referred to a Larger Bench for resolution, emphasizing the need for further consideration to address the inconsistent precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117328