<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 345 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117323</link>
    <description>The appeal by Thai Airways against an Order-in-Appeal resulted in the reduction of redemption fine and penalty imposed for mis-declaration of goods. Despite discrepancies in descriptions of the goods in various documents, the court upheld the decision to confiscate and impose penalties, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility for the mis-declaration. The appellant&#039;s failure to appear in court and casual approach to the appeal process led to the rejection of the appeal, with the judge supporting the reduction of fines and penalties by the Commissioner (Appeals) and emphasizing the accountability of Thai Airways for the mis-declared goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 345 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117323</link>
      <description>The appeal by Thai Airways against an Order-in-Appeal resulted in the reduction of redemption fine and penalty imposed for mis-declaration of goods. Despite discrepancies in descriptions of the goods in various documents, the court upheld the decision to confiscate and impose penalties, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility for the mis-declaration. The appellant&#039;s failure to appear in court and casual approach to the appeal process led to the rejection of the appeal, with the judge supporting the reduction of fines and penalties by the Commissioner (Appeals) and emphasizing the accountability of Thai Airways for the mis-declared goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>