<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 339 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117315</link>
    <description>The case involved the liability to pay the applicable rate of duty on sugar supplied to the Government of India on a loan basis as levy sugar. The Commissioner found that the appellants had paid the duty promptly and there was no evidence of deliberate suppression to evade payment. The imposition of penalties and interest was deemed unwarranted. The Revenue&#039;s argument for a mandatory penalty was rejected by the Tribunal, citing a government circular and a previous ruling that no penalty was leviable when there was no revenue loss. Ultimately, the judgment favored the appellants, dismissing the imposition of penalties and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 339 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117315</link>
      <description>The case involved the liability to pay the applicable rate of duty on sugar supplied to the Government of India on a loan basis as levy sugar. The Commissioner found that the appellants had paid the duty promptly and there was no evidence of deliberate suppression to evade payment. The imposition of penalties and interest was deemed unwarranted. The Revenue&#039;s argument for a mandatory penalty was rejected by the Tribunal, citing a government circular and a previous ruling that no penalty was leviable when there was no revenue loss. Ultimately, the judgment favored the appellants, dismissing the imposition of penalties and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>