<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 535 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117295</link>
    <description>Admissions corroborated by contemporaneous internal production records and seized documents sustained the finding of clandestine removal of rigid PVC pipes, and the duty demand was upheld. Shortages of finished goods and inputs were also held dutyable because the stock reconciliations and raw-material accounting explanations did not match the recorded balances, so those demands were confirmed. Confiscation of inputs, finished goods, land, building, plant and machinery was set aside for want of the requisite legal ingredients for confiscation on mere non-accountal. Penalties on the manufacturing units and the General Manager were sustained but reduced in view of the facts and circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:21:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 535 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117295</link>
      <description>Admissions corroborated by contemporaneous internal production records and seized documents sustained the finding of clandestine removal of rigid PVC pipes, and the duty demand was upheld. Shortages of finished goods and inputs were also held dutyable because the stock reconciliations and raw-material accounting explanations did not match the recorded balances, so those demands were confirmed. Confiscation of inputs, finished goods, land, building, plant and machinery was set aside for want of the requisite legal ingredients for confiscation on mere non-accountal. Penalties on the manufacturing units and the General Manager were sustained but reduced in view of the facts and circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>