<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 698 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117287</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, rejected the department&#039;s appeals under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as they were not required to be listed for admission under Section 35B(1). The appeals, involving small amounts, were dismissed due to the absence of respondents and no adjournment request being made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 698 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117287</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, rejected the department&#039;s appeals under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as they were not required to be listed for admission under Section 35B(1). The appeals, involving small amounts, were dismissed due to the absence of respondents and no adjournment request being made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>