<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 324 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117276</link>
    <description>The appeals involved a dispute over the admissibility of Modvat credit on capital goods and the permissibility of cash refunds. The Tribunal allowed the Modvat credit initially denied, but the cash refund claim was reversed by the Commissioner (Appeals) based on precedents. The judge noted conflicting decisions in various cases and upheld the ruling specifying cash refunds only for unutilized credit in exports. The judge held that the appellants did not have a favorable case, leading to dismissal of the appeals due to the amounts involved being below Rs. 50,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 324 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117276</link>
      <description>The appeals involved a dispute over the admissibility of Modvat credit on capital goods and the permissibility of cash refunds. The Tribunal allowed the Modvat credit initially denied, but the cash refund claim was reversed by the Commissioner (Appeals) based on precedents. The judge noted conflicting decisions in various cases and upheld the ruling specifying cash refunds only for unutilized credit in exports. The judge held that the appellants did not have a favorable case, leading to dismissal of the appeals due to the amounts involved being below Rs. 50,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>