https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117270 The Tribunal found a violation of the procedure established by law in the adjudication process due to the denial of the mandatory third adjournment as required by Section 33A of the Central Excise Act. The Commissioner's decision was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a new hearing where all issues, including crucial evidence, would be considered, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements for fairness in adjudication processes. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:29:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117270 The Tribunal found a violation of the procedure established by law in the adjudication process due to the denial of the mandatory third adjournment as required by Section 33A of the Central Excise Act. The Commissioner's decision was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a new hearing where all issues, including crucial evidence, would be considered, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements for fairness in adjudication processes. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117270