<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 314 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that expenses related to gratuity and benefits paid to employees of an acquired unit should not be included in the manufacturing cost of the final product. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; plea for a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery based on financial hardship and being declared a sick unit by the BIFR. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the appellants that the reopening of proceedings through a Show Cause Notice was time-barred, as the issue had been previously addressed and dropped. The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; requests for waiver of pre-deposit, stay of recovery, and early hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 314 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that expenses related to gratuity and benefits paid to employees of an acquired unit should not be included in the manufacturing cost of the final product. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; plea for a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery based on financial hardship and being declared a sick unit by the BIFR. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the appellants that the reopening of proceedings through a Show Cause Notice was time-barred, as the issue had been previously addressed and dropped. The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; requests for waiver of pre-deposit, stay of recovery, and early hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>