<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 797 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the additional ground of appeal, citing the assessee&#039;s right to raise the issue. The estimation of business income for the assessment year 1986-87 was found unjustified and deleted. Undisclosed income from the pawning business and interest income estimations for various assessment years were also deleted due to lack of proper opportunity for explanation. The issue of undisclosed investment in the pawning business was remanded for fresh consideration. Similarly, the estimation of profit on labor/sale of gold and addition on account of purchase were remanded. The Tribunal remanded the issue of credit for surrendered amount during the block period for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:24:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 797 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the additional ground of appeal, citing the assessee&#039;s right to raise the issue. The estimation of business income for the assessment year 1986-87 was found unjustified and deleted. Undisclosed income from the pawning business and interest income estimations for various assessment years were also deleted due to lack of proper opportunity for explanation. The issue of undisclosed investment in the pawning business was remanded for fresh consideration. Similarly, the estimation of profit on labor/sale of gold and addition on account of purchase were remanded. The Tribunal remanded the issue of credit for surrendered amount during the block period for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>