<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 355 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117246</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of a composite penalty was waived where the confiscated goods were not prima facie shown to be imported goods, weakening the Customs Act basis for the levy. The Tribunal treated the penalty as a consolidated levy linked to both the Cenvat Credit Rules and Customs provisions, and noted that no separate penalty was shown under the Central Excise Rules alone. On that prima facie assessment, the Tribunal dispensed with pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 355 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117246</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of a composite penalty was waived where the confiscated goods were not prima facie shown to be imported goods, weakening the Customs Act basis for the levy. The Tribunal treated the penalty as a consolidated levy linked to both the Cenvat Credit Rules and Customs provisions, and noted that no separate penalty was shown under the Central Excise Rules alone. On that prima facie assessment, the Tribunal dispensed with pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>