<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 349 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the appropriation of the pre-deposit against the confirmed demand under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The decision allowed for adjustments between duty amounts due and refunds, leading to the denial of the appellant&#039;s claim for a full refund despite their successful appeal outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 349 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the appropriation of the pre-deposit against the confirmed demand under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The decision allowed for adjustments between duty amounts due and refunds, leading to the denial of the appellant&#039;s claim for a full refund despite their successful appeal outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>