<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 735 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1990-91. The decision emphasized the technical nature of the default in not depositing the amount in a specified account, without evidence of mala fide intent. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s good faith actions in investing for construction purposes and utilizing the exempted amount appropriately, leading to the penalty being deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:35:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 735 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1990-91. The decision emphasized the technical nature of the default in not depositing the amount in a specified account, without evidence of mala fide intent. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s good faith actions in investing for construction purposes and utilizing the exempted amount appropriately, leading to the penalty being deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>