<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 342 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117227</link>
    <description>Trade notices under the amended excise rules clarified that a manufacturer could bring duty-paid goods into registered premises for storage and no prior permission from Central Excise officers was required. That departmental clarification bound the authority, so a request for permission could not be refused contrary to the settled position. The refusal to permit storage of duty-paid goods was therefore illegal and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:09:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 342 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117227</link>
      <description>Trade notices under the amended excise rules clarified that a manufacturer could bring duty-paid goods into registered premises for storage and no prior permission from Central Excise officers was required. That departmental clarification bound the authority, so a request for permission could not be refused contrary to the settled position. The refusal to permit storage of duty-paid goods was therefore illegal and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>