<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 340 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal seeking rectification of a Final Order due to failure to clear goods imported in 1991, leading to their disposal in 2000. The appellant&#039;s arguments of ignorance of import and lack of notice on disposal were not accepted. The Tribunal found the original order legally sound and error-free, rejecting the rectification application and upholding duty recovery for uncleared goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 340 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal seeking rectification of a Final Order due to failure to clear goods imported in 1991, leading to their disposal in 2000. The appellant&#039;s arguments of ignorance of import and lack of notice on disposal were not accepted. The Tribunal found the original order legally sound and error-free, rejecting the rectification application and upholding duty recovery for uncleared goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>