<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 329 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants were eligible for the SSI exemption as the clocks were cleared without the logo affixed and only had it added after installation. The Tribunal concluded that since the clocks were not marketed with the logo affixed, the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the Notification. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellants were granted the benefit of the Notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:21:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 329 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants were eligible for the SSI exemption as the clocks were cleared without the logo affixed and only had it added after installation. The Tribunal concluded that since the clocks were not marketed with the logo affixed, the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the Notification. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellants were granted the benefit of the Notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>