<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 553 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117183</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, additions based only on estimates or assumptions were not upheld where the assessee&#039;s explanation was supported by books or contemporaneous material and no incriminating evidence was found. Cash found at the residence was accepted as linked to the firm&#039;s cash-in-hand and the addition was deleted. Additions for alleged unexplained investment in lands and FDRs were remanded for fresh verification because the cash flow statement had not been properly examined. The addition for difference in construction cost based on the DVO report was deleted. Estimated truck income was sustained only partly, and interest under section 158BFA was deleted on the facts noted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 553 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117183</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, additions based only on estimates or assumptions were not upheld where the assessee&#039;s explanation was supported by books or contemporaneous material and no incriminating evidence was found. Cash found at the residence was accepted as linked to the firm&#039;s cash-in-hand and the addition was deleted. Additions for alleged unexplained investment in lands and FDRs were remanded for fresh verification because the cash flow statement had not been properly examined. The addition for difference in construction cost based on the DVO report was deleted. Estimated truck income was sustained only partly, and interest under section 158BFA was deleted on the facts noted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>