<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 381 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Order-in-Appeal that allowed Modvat credit on inputs in finished goods stock. The decision emphasized the importance of considering evidence, specifically the consumption ratio provided by the respondents, before denying such credit. It highlighted the need for proper analysis and justification by the adjudicating authority in similar cases to support any denial of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:21:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 381 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Order-in-Appeal that allowed Modvat credit on inputs in finished goods stock. The decision emphasized the importance of considering evidence, specifically the consumption ratio provided by the respondents, before denying such credit. It highlighted the need for proper analysis and justification by the adjudicating authority in similar cases to support any denial of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>