<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned a duty demand on imported copper scraps, rejecting reliance on London Metal Exchange prices over transaction values. Despite authorities citing higher LME prices, the appellant&#039;s argument for transaction value assessment prevailed. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to transaction value principles, considering market fluctuations and lack of evidence supporting alternative assessment bases. The decision highlighted the importance of non-selective pricing assessments and upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the duty demand based on the absence of evidence indicating price suppression or non-commercial influences in the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned a duty demand on imported copper scraps, rejecting reliance on London Metal Exchange prices over transaction values. Despite authorities citing higher LME prices, the appellant&#039;s argument for transaction value assessment prevailed. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to transaction value principles, considering market fluctuations and lack of evidence supporting alternative assessment bases. The decision highlighted the importance of non-selective pricing assessments and upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the duty demand based on the absence of evidence indicating price suppression or non-commercial influences in the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>