<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 371 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to drop the penalty on the respondent-company for illegal import of goods on forged documents, emphasizing the employee&#039;s independent actions beyond the scope of employment and without company direction. Despite the employee&#039;s admission to forging documents, no evidence implicated the company, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the affirmation of the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal concluded that the company could not be held vicariously liable for the employee&#039;s misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 371 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to drop the penalty on the respondent-company for illegal import of goods on forged documents, emphasizing the employee&#039;s independent actions beyond the scope of employment and without company direction. Despite the employee&#039;s admission to forging documents, no evidence implicated the company, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the affirmation of the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal concluded that the company could not be held vicariously liable for the employee&#039;s misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>