<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 648 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117163</link>
    <description>Transfer of the right to construct additional floors in an existing building was treated as transfer of valuable immovable-property rights falling within &quot;property&quot; and therefore a capital asset. The transaction went beyond a bare licence to use the premises, because enforceable rights were extinguished by registered sale deeds. The absence of an immediately ascertainable cost of acquisition did not by itself defeat capital gains tax where the asset could be valued; capital gains were to be computed on proper valuation rather than excluded from the charging provision. The matter was remanded for determination of capital gain after valuation of the transferred rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 648 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117163</link>
      <description>Transfer of the right to construct additional floors in an existing building was treated as transfer of valuable immovable-property rights falling within &quot;property&quot; and therefore a capital asset. The transaction went beyond a bare licence to use the premises, because enforceable rights were extinguished by registered sale deeds. The absence of an immediately ascertainable cost of acquisition did not by itself defeat capital gains tax where the asset could be valued; capital gains were to be computed on proper valuation rather than excluded from the charging provision. The matter was remanded for determination of capital gain after valuation of the transferred rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>