<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 333 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, directing verification of Electricity Board log sheets, allowing cross-examination of witnesses, and reassessment of demand and penalties. The decision was based on discrepancies between production reports and electricity consumption records, emphasizing the need for further examination and evidence presentation by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 333 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, directing verification of Electricity Board log sheets, allowing cross-examination of witnesses, and reassessment of demand and penalties. The decision was based on discrepancies between production reports and electricity consumption records, emphasizing the need for further examination and evidence presentation by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>