<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 331 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117145</link>
    <description>Declarations describing the goods and claiming exemption were treated as significant for limitation, because no objection was raised by the Revenue at the relevant time. On that basis, a demand relating to the period from 1 May 1994 to 31 March 1995, issued by show cause notice on 21 January 1997, was considered prima facie barred by limitation. The assessee therefore established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and the stay petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 331 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117145</link>
      <description>Declarations describing the goods and claiming exemption were treated as significant for limitation, because no objection was raised by the Revenue at the relevant time. On that basis, a demand relating to the period from 1 May 1994 to 31 March 1995, issued by show cause notice on 21 January 1997, was considered prima facie barred by limitation. The assessee therefore established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and the stay petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>