<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 393 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117127</link>
    <description>A manufacturer was entitled to Cenvat credit where inputs were cleared on payment of duty to a job worker, processed, received back under the relevant notification, and used in further manufacture. The only objection concerned the duty-paying document, but the manufacturer&#039;s own invoice was accepted as a valid document in these facts because duty payment and subsequent use of the inputs were undisputed. The department could not apply a different standard merely because the credit claim was based on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. The credit was therefore admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 393 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117127</link>
      <description>A manufacturer was entitled to Cenvat credit where inputs were cleared on payment of duty to a job worker, processed, received back under the relevant notification, and used in further manufacture. The only objection concerned the duty-paying document, but the manufacturer&#039;s own invoice was accepted as a valid document in these facts because duty payment and subsequent use of the inputs were undisputed. The department could not apply a different standard merely because the credit claim was based on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. The credit was therefore admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>